The Anatomy of a White Liberal
By Joe Rebel
I have white liberal family members and acquaintances whom I thank of very fondly. That being said, I truly do believe deep down in my heart that most white liberals are truly good and decent people. They really are. I don’t believe that many of them are intentionally trying to destroy Western Civilization and the race that created it. The problem is that 1) They are very naïve when it comes to race relations and 2) they do not see the consequeces that will become when whites do become (Heaven forbid) a minority in the Western nations.
I can’t be mad at white liberals too much, though from time to time my first thought would be to walk up to them and shake them while saying “wake the hell up! Can’t you see that massive third world immigration is completely destroying our country?” From the cradle, they are conditioned like Pavlov’s dogs that any type of racial pride or feelings towards one’s own kindred is not only wrong, but completely immoral. This type of thinking has been drilled into them in their homes, schools, and churches.
From John Locke’s idea of tabula rasa, They have come to believe that it is not genetics but environment that determines one’s behavior. Other principles that they have been taught from their “learned” educators that have shaped their type of mindset are the ideas that “we are all equal,” “colors only skin deep,” “there is no such thing as race,” etc. The list goes on and on.
Already feeling ashamed of being white and constantly browbeaten from numerous guilt lectures about slavery to the Holocaust, they are only more than willing to do what they can to correct past mistakes (whether partially true or imaginary) that they feel their race is guilty of committing, whether it’s championing minority right’s to even adopting nonwhite children. The more dedicated of white liberals will take a nonwhite spouse or encourage their children to do so.
White liberals have a heightened sense of sentimentality about them. The idea of poverty and warfare in the third world makes them tear up, so they donate sums of money to foreign aid and do humanitarian peace work for Amnesty International in a effort to help underdeveloped countries, all the while completely ignoring the needs of their own race.
The idea of the decline of both the white race and Occidental culture is neither a concern for them or something that they believe will never ever happen (at least not in their lifetime). To them, even if that is the case, then so be it. After all, they have been taught all of their lives that their race has oppressed and massacred people of color for centuries, so what is the point of trying perserve that which you hate? Like lambs to the slaughter, they willingly accept their fate as if it was written in stone.
Multiculturalism to a white liberal is like a drug, for they continue to scream for more and more of it, not thinking about the consequences that might befall later on as our country becomes swamped by those with a stronger sense of kindred loyalty and a deep-seated hatred for the West. Having been taught about equality all their lives, they ignore I.Q. differences, human biodiversity, and black-on-white crime rate statistics as relevant. They truly believe that once the United States and other Western countries are no longer predominately white, that all will just be peaches and cream. But this is not the case.
Much like the ending of Jean Raspails classic The Camp of the Saints, as most of the West is swamped by third world immigrants, eventually the same nonwhites turn on the same white liberals who welcomed them into their countries with open arms.
The same goes for the new South Africa. white liberal activist worked alongside with blacks in order to end Apartheid that had been in effect from 1948 to 1993. Now these same blacks are showing their gratitude by robbing, raping, and murdering the white Boer minority, commiting horrible, unspeakable atrocities to vile to mention. This was their reward for trying to end the "racist" apartheid system, a system which kept fellow whites from black harm for decades in the first place.
In the end, white liberals will get all the multiculturalism they desire, but it might just cost them and their childrens own lives.
Ending the White Man's Burden
In these days, there is no time for feeling guilty. The white race has a lot to be proud of. We are a race of builders, inventors, agriculturalists, discoverers, and conquerers. In fact, other races should thank us, not that we should expect one. Had it not been for us, the other races would be lost.
There is a reason why we should not feed wild animals at the zoo. Because it encourages them to want more and more. The same for nonwhites. If you continue to give and give, do not be surprised if they continue to come back for more, and more, and more, until everything we have is theirs.
One of the weaknesses that we whites tend to have is sentimentality. And theres nothing wrong about that. However, our enemies, the jews and nonwhites, are using that weakness to drag us down.
During the times of Imperialism, whites sailed to Africa, Asia, and other small native islands in the hope of "westernizing" the nonwhites and try to civilize them and even convert them to Christianity. This is what Rudyard Kipling called the "white man's burden."
Those who are racially aware know that it is hopeless to civilize and convert nonwhites into Western culture. They have their own heroes, legends, and cultural beliefs and have no need to comform to a culture and religion that was never theirs to begin with. In America, we have been trying to "westernize" the indians for 400 years and we have been trying to do the same with the black and hispanics for 200 years with no luck still.
Unfortunately, there is still a need for whites to continue with "the white man's burden" even though it is a failed notion that has done nothing but brought us down instead. While we set out to try to help nonwhites better themselves, we have instead let our white homelands fall into cultural and moral decay and let those that we were trying to help into our countries.
It is rather sad that white liberals and humanitarians are more willing to try to help nonwhite countries more than their own white homelands. In fact, they will not even lift a finger whenever a white is killed by nonwhites.
We need not concern ourselves about what goes on in nonwhite countries. We are to only concern ourselves with one thing only: the survival, expansion, and advancement of our race. I could care less with whats going on in places like Rwanda, Darfur, or any other nonwhite slum. It is time to stop giving credit and respect to nonwhites because they do not deserve it, nor have they earned it at all.
When confronted with the questions "why are you only concerned with whites only? Don't you know that there is good and bad in all races? You should judge a person by their character and not their color or race!" We must remember two things.
1) Character and race are two different things completely. Lets not forget that each race has their own set of beliefs and ideas. But the main difference between race and character is race is what builds a civilization and character is what determines the morals and ethincs that come with it. Both race and character are complint to one another. We always quote the Golden Rule which states that we should "do unto others as you would have them do to you," yet shouldn't that also include the right for others to perserve their own history and customs without being forced out of existance either by replacement or miscegenation.
2) Not all whites are perfect little angels. Yes, there are whites that are just plain out bad and despicable. The same applies to trees. Not every tree bears good fruit. But they are still our tree. We do not need to worry about what's going on with our neighbors tree. We should worry about our tree and what is good for it. Only we are to be responsible for our racial tree.
In order to do that, we must have our own living space in order to survive and perserve our racial culture and heritage. A land that will never again be inhabited by racial aliens and mongrels. The same must go for nonwhites. It is time to stop caring about what they are doing and let them shift for their own in their own countries. If they go extinct, it will only be by their doing, not our's. We should never let other races crowd us off on this tiny little planet we call Earth.
A Response To Critisism Part 1
by Joe Rebel
(These are my own personal views and some may disagree with me on a few things. But overall, I think most will agree the majority of what is written).
Whenever any of us or any other white dares speak out against multiculturalism, we get shouted down and are name-called simply because we are standing up for a cause that that is worth fighting for. We've heard it all and probably been called it all and maybe even a hell lot worse. But now, it is time to respond back to these charges.
Racist- This word is a double-edged sword for white nationalist. Some embrace it and other's don't because they see it as a Trotskyist smear epithet. The word has various meanings of course depending on how one views the word. For me, If I am called a racist, I ask the person how they would define the word itself. If by racist do they mean I hate and mistreat anyone who is not white, then of course not. One the other hand, if by racist they mean I care for my own kindred and folk, then I must be. Either way, if you are a white person who isn't affected by political correctness bs, you are going to be called a racist no matter what. How you see it's meaning depends entirely on you.
White supremacist- The concept of white supremacy usually brings up the past memories of slavery, Jim Crow segregation, colonialism, apartheid and any other forms of policies where whites manage the life of nonwhites and so on. We do not live in the 18th and 19th centuries. We live in the 21st century. All of these various systems were the result of making the best of a bad situation, even though it beat the heck out of integration, which has proven to be another failed system. No race wants to be controlled by another race period.
Supremacy is believing that your group is better than another group to a certain degree. All races and ethnic tribes have a feeling of superiority over others. Thats what causes them to have compete with other groups. If they feel that another group threatens their way of life, there will be confrontations. In a way, we might believe that we are superior to other races in some ways more or less, but at the same time, we do not want to rule over other races. We merely want to rule ourselves and raise our children to appreciate their heritage. So do I think that my race is better than other? Most definitely! But you know what? So do other races think the same way. It does not offend me in the least either. Each race has their own strengths and weakness. What one race does better in, another race may do poorer than others and so on.
Neo-Nazi- A slur in order to denigrate racially awaken whites and compare their views to that of Adolf Hitler's Third Reich. There are white nationalist who do call themselves national socialist and follow Hitler's political philosophy, but other's don't. The point is it is unfair to call all white nationalist "neo-Nazi's" because there are various philosophies withing our cause. Some white nationalist are national socialist and some are not. Although I would rather be called a Nazi than a liberal, a neo-con, or a communist anyday of the week.
Fascist- The same applies to the neo-Nazi slur, only this time it is referring to Benito Mussolini's Fascist Italy. The issue of race is heavily debated when it comes to fascism because some fascist embraced it while others did not. Fascism was a strongly nationalistic philosophy which stresses an organic identity based on corporate statism, a type of economic policy that is neither capitalist and Marxian socialist. Again, some white nationalist might be fascist and some are not, so it is wrong to say that all white nationalist fit into this fold.
Anti-Semite- Preferably anti-Jewish since most Jews have very little, if any, lineage to the ancient tribes of Israel. The anti-Semite slur merely means being opposed to jewish control over Western nations. It is not hard for someone to be called an anti-Semite whenever they show that jews have way too much power over our media, banking systems, and government foreign policies. Or to show that it is their hatred for non-Jews as shown by their Talmud which condones pedophilia, deceit and other vile acts. You are only anti-Semitic when you expose their own hatred for non-Jews.
Hatemonger- I like to think of ourselves as lovemongers because we believe in loving our own and doing what is in the best interest of our folk.
Bigot- A bigot is some one who is intolerant of others or takes offense to the opinions of other people. But who really is intolerant? We don't get to have any say when it's our turns to talk and when we do talk, we are rudely interrupted and criticized by those who claim that they are so "tolerant." Looks to me that they are the real bigots. Not so tolerant after all it seems.
There will be more to come later.
Defending Ethnocentrism Part 1
Ethnocentrism as we well know is defined as 1. the belief that one's own race or ethnic group is superior to others and 2. the overriding concern with race (one's own race to be more exact). This perspective is usually met with scorn by most people in this age of tolerance and multiculturalism. But is it really a bad thing? Absolutley not!
Mankind is divided up into 3 racial categories. 1) Caucasoid, 2) Negroid, and 3) Mongoloid or Turanian and then there are several different subraces (such as Native Indians) and hybrid groups such as Jews, Gypsies (mixed with white and Indians), Australoids (who appear to be part Negroid), Indians (from India, modern day Hindus who are a sad remnant of "wheat-colored" Aryans and dark-skinned Dravidians), Hispanics (whites, Indians, and negros), and Arabs.
In fact, all life is in a social Darwinistic competition with one another, whether it be race, gender, economics, ideologies. It's always been that way and it always will. It's is only natural for others who share common traits, ideas, culture, and heritage to defend one another against those who are different. We believe that race is natural and it is the primary determinant over everything else.
Do we feel that the white race is surperior to others to a certain degree? Yes! But so do other races and ethnic groups. Especially the Jews, who feel that as the "Chosen People" that it gives them the right to control non-Jews physically and emotionally whenever the opportunity presents itself. Each race and ethnic group has love for their own. At the end of the day, most prefer to be with others who are like them. It makes them feel more safe and secure.
If all races and nations were really equal, then why do non-white immigrants and refugees have to migrate to white countires? If they really wanted to prove their equality, they would stay in their own homelands and fix them to the best of their ability.
Its a love-hate thing. We love our own and hate those who would destroy our race. Our love for our own is no different than a mother's love for her child and hatred for anyone who would harm her young.
It is sad that the entire field of anthropology as well as other social sciences have been corrupted by egalitarian thinking thanks to Jews like Frank Boaz, Gene Weltfish, Ashley Montagu (whose real name was Israel Ehrenberg and the author of the popular egalitarian-universalist book Man's Most Dangerous Myth: The Fallacy of Race), and a whole list of other jewish race denial propagandists.
Despite being the master manipulators in race-denial, these same Jews would have a fit if their children married a non-Jew, being that they promote race-mixing between whites and nonwhites, but never amongst their own.
The term "melting pot" was coined by a Jews named Israel Zangwill, who created a 1908 play by the same name. He envisioned a world where all ethnic and religious differences would be done away with, but was also a Zionist, supporting at one time Theodor Herzl, a Austro-Hungarian journalist who is today known as the father of modern political Zionism. Zangwill would later found his own organization called the Jewish Territorialist Organization in 1903 whose goal was to establish as Jewish homeland wherever they could find one. Such hypocrisy indeed.
While each race and ethnicity has their own unique way of life, that does not mean we want them to mingle and mix with us. So to any nonwhite who has a problem with me because I simply don't want to be their next door neighbor or date their daughter, tough! It's nothing personal, but I believe in the old Agrarian saying that birds of a feather should flock together.
As much as they try to prove that there really are no racial differences, the evidence will always present itself in the end. Race has and will always exist, and no matter how many times people want to deny that it doesn't, they're only living in a mental bubble of self-denial. It is the very reason why we are white today because our parents practiced racial seperation and segregation
Defending Ethnocentrism Part 2
Everyone is racist and ethnocentric. Plain and simple. Racism and ethnocentrism is a survival mechanism.
You say that racism is wrong. Your supposed to love, not hate. Why it is the love for my own race that makes me cherish the racial differences that is all around me. However, I feel I don't need to be up close and personal in order to experience true diversity rather than having every single type of race, color, or culture imported over to our Western homelands.
And you know, what, I'm proud to be racist. It's my right to be racist. If it wasn't for racism, we would not be white today.
I am a racist because I believe in 1) the Biblical concept of kind-after-kind and 2) the Constitution, which gives me the right to freely associate with anyone of my choosing.
I am an anthropological racist. I believe that there are in fact physical, mental, biological, cultural, and spiritual differences in the races of mankind. It is those differences that set us apart from one another. Some races do better in some areas more than other races. Asians excel in school, blacks dominate sports, and whites explore the ends of the earth and establish civilizations. Though to simply say that all races are equal, is just like saying that an eagle is equal to a sparrow, or a wolf is equal to chihuahua.
After years of propaganda drilled into their heads, the modern day white person has the same mentality as that of a tamed lion at the zoo. Even though the lion is still a lion, it acts more like a domesticated house cat. Even if they are still white in body, they have the mind of a mongrel.
The white man of today has become an sissified wimp. In the end, he will sit back and let other races trample over him and the land that once was his. He will watch as strangers steal his women away and suck the life out of his country. And when the time comes, he will be herded off like cattle, wondering to himself how it all came down to this.
As I said in part 1. All life is in a social Darwinistic struggle with each other. It is only natural for others to pair up with others who are like them, especially race. The reason why there are racial problems is because when you put different differing groups together and integrate them, there will always be chaos. We do not see eye to eye on many things. We don't share the same value systems.The only way to stop these problems is to seperate the races and give them their own territories to live in so that they can be able to advance at a level that keeps up with their own pace.Race is family.
We are all just one big ethnic tribe when it comes down to it. Racism can never be stopped, no matter how much time, effort, and money is put into stopping it. In the end, tribal loyalty will always reign supreme.
That which benefits the white race should be held with high vindication; that which harms the white race should be treated as anathema.